Home Blog Page 19

Vaccinated People Should Watch This To Make Their Next Informed Decision

0

Dear Vaccinated People

Vaccinated people may now be asking themselves: “Why isn’t my doctor warning me about the likelihood or probability of a severe adverse reaction I might have?”

Everyone who has received one or more COVID injections, has not been harmed, and thinks that anti-vaxxers are crazy, may want to watch this video. It is 37 minutes long, packed with examples of what has happened to several million people.

Nobody wants anything bad to happen to others, so this video shows what most doctors are not warning their patients about – the possibility of these things happening.

Vaccinated people may now be asking themselves: “Why isn’t my doctor warning me about the likelihood or probability of a severe adverse reaction I might have?” The answer is that doctors have been threatened by the “health regulators” and it is likely they care more about keeping their job than they care about your health.

One more thing – If any of the things in this video happen to you, your life will be over, even if it doesn’t kill you. Please especially watch for the actions and response of the so-called “health professionals,” The World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum.

Chris Sky Tells A Compelling Story of Resistance: With COVID Over, What Will They Try Next?

Chris Sky: Just Say No

Listen to Chris Sky, he is really switched on. He can talk the hind legs off a dog. He saw the future before it happened and he is still doing it.

Tommy Robinson interviews Chris Sky. His message is clear – “Just say NO. Do not comply. Ever.”

The powers that be do not have our interests at heart. They only care about themselves.

Tommy Robinson Interview

This interview by Tommy Robinson and UrbanScoop.

To support UrbanScoop, visit https://urbanscoop.news/supportus/

Tommy Robinson “This interview was quite possibly the easiest one I have ever done. Chris has a lot to say, he’s well informed, he’s relentless, he inspires people to ‘Just Say No’ to government overreach.”

“I have watched Chris for some time now and admired his relentless pursuit for truth in a mad world of mainstream media disinformation.”

You can find Chris on GETTR here – @RealChrisSky

About Chris Sky

Chris Sky helps people to understand and to assert their rights and preserve their freedoms. He leads by example with his very life on the line. His mission is to help and educate others, but this has lead to him being targeted and persecuted by the Canadian government. He says this targeting is being done “in previously unspeakable ways, which are now becoming commonplace.” The people in control of many countries around the world are taking us step-by-step towards tyranny.

Chris Sky
Chris Sky speaking. Image c/o RealChrisSky.com

Are COVID Vaccines Safe And Effective?

0

Safe and Effective, They Say

Safe and Effective, the government says. The world’s governments have blanketed the airwaves with ads for almost two years.

Government’s aim is to push the people to get vaccinated if they have resisted so far. They also tell those who have not had their first or second booster they are “not fully vaccinated” until they do.

The ads tell everyone the vaccines are not only safe, they are also effective. The video below is proof.

Of something.

The video ends with cartoons made for children, to gently coerce them into asking their parents for a vaccination. That may have been the case with this five-year-old-girl in Canberra, Australia.

This is one of many examples of safety and effectiveness of these vaccines.

Politicians tell stories about masks and the use of ivermectin. Only a few tell the truth. The rest prefer fiction.

safe and effective
Safe and Effective. Image by GoodSciencing.com

Doctor Talks About COVID in Four Minutes

Dr. Roger Hodkinson explains what’s been happening with COVID and COVID vaccines. Dr. Hodkinson is a fellow of the College of Pathologists, Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

British MHRA Expected Many Vaccine Adverse Reactions, in October 2020

The British MHRA expected many vaccine adverse reactions, in October 2020, months before the vaccine rollout started. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a tender for “an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs).”

The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.

But they went ahead with the vaccine program anyway and passed it off as “Safe and Effective,” even though they knew it would cause serious harm.

The tender was issued by the MHRA Buyer Organisation and on 2 March 2022, it was still displayed on the European Union’s Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) website. TED is a Supplement to the Official Journal of the EU.

For reasons of extreme urgency under Regulation 32(2)(c) related to the release of a Covid-19 vaccine MHRA have accelerated the sourcing and implementation of a vaccine specific AI tool.

Strictly necessary — it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, if the MHRA does not implement the AI tool, it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.

Reasons of extreme urgency — the MHRA recognises that its planned procurement process for the SafetyConnect programme, including the AI tool, would not have concluded by vaccine launch. Leading to a inability to effectively monitor adverse reactions to a Covid-19 vaccine.

Events unforeseeable — the Covid-19 crisis is novel and developments in the search of a Covid-19 vaccine have not followed any predictable pattern so far.

The tender document has been stored in multiple places in case they try to erase this evidence by removing it from the tender website. View or Download it here.

The contract was awarded to the only applicant, Genpact (UK) for 1.5 million GBP.

Adverse-reaction-tender-2020-OJS207-506291-en

mhra expected many adverse reactions
MHRA expected many adverse reactions but went ahead anyway.

Ivermectin Study: Lifesaving Medication Governments Banned, Aided By Media

0

Governments around the world banned the use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine that were a lifesaving triple-therapy against COVID-19. It has long been thought that their reason for doing this was because they wanted to force everyone in the world to use the expensive, negative efficacy vaccines.

Dr. Pierre Kory already revealed the Ivermectin Story. Recently, the large, published Itajai (Brazil) study showed that strict regular use of IVM led to a 100% reduction in hospitalization, and a 90% reduction in death. Now there is a follow-up to that study.

People are saying governments still don’t care, because it was never about health, it was about control, and they were being controlled too.

Here is the abstract to the study, with links to both studies mentioned above.

The Abstract

Background: Previously, we demonstrated that ivermectin use as prophylaxis for COVID-19 was associated with reductions in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates, and in the risk of dying from COVID-19, irrespective of regularity and accumulated use of ivermectin, in an observational, prospectively obtained data from a strictly controlled city-wide program in a city in Southern Brazil (Itajaí, SC, Brazil) of of medically-based, optional use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19.
In this study, our objective was to explore the data obtained from the program to evaluate whether the level of regularity of ivermectin use impacted in the reductions in these outcomes, aiming to determine if ivermectin showed a progressive dose-, regularity-response in terms of protection from COVID-19 and COVID-19 related outcomes.
Materials and methods: This is a prospective observational study of the program mention above, that used ivermectin at a dose of 0.2mg/kg/day for two consecutive days, every 15 days. We obtained and analyzed the data regarding the accumulated dose of ivermectin use, in addition to age and comorbidities, to analyze the patterns of reduction of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates, and risk of dying from COVID-19, according to the regularity and amount of ivermectin used in a 5-month period.
Following definitions of regularity, we considered as strictly regular subjects that used at least 180mg of ivermectin (180mg = 30 tablets), and as sporadic users subjects that used 60mg (= 10 tablets) or less during the 5-month period. Comparisons between subjects that did not use ivermectin and these two levels of regularity of ivermectin use were performed.
Analysis of the intermediate levels of ivermectin use are present in the supplement appendix of this study.
To analyze hospitalization and mortality rates, we utilized the database of COVID-19 infections of all participants, from Itajaí and outside.
To analyze COVID-19 infection rate and risk of dying from COVID-19 we utilized the Itajaí city database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed, followed by multivariate adjusted analysis for residual differences (doubly adjusted analysis).
Results: Of the 7,345 cases of COVID-19, 3,034 occurred in non-users, 1,627 in sporadic users, and 289 in strict users, while the remaining cases occurred in the intermediate levels of ivermectin use. Strict users were older (p < 0.0001) and non-significant higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension.
COVID-19 infection rate was 39% lower among strict users [4.03% infection rate; risk ratio (RR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (n = 289 in each group for both comparisons; 95%CI), 0.53 – 0.70; p < 0.0001] than in non-users (6.64% infection rate), and non-significant 11% reduction compared to sporadic users (4.54% infection rate) (n = 1,627 in each group; RR, 0.89; 95%CI 0.76 – 1.03; p = 0.11).

Hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in strict users, compared to non-users and to sporadic users, both before and after PSM (RR, 0.00; 95%CI, not applicable; p < 0.0001). After PSM, hospitalization rate was 35% lower among sporadic users than non-users (RR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.44 – 0.70; p = 0.03). In propensity score matched groups, multivariate-adjusted mortality rate was 90% lower in strict users compared to non-users (RR, 0.10, 95%CI, 0.02 – 0.45; p = 0.003) and 79% lower than in sporadic users (RR, 0.21; RR, 0.04 – 1.00; p = 0.05), while sporadic users had a 37% reduction in mortality rate compared to non-users (RR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.41 – 0.99; p = 0.043).

Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among strict users than non-users (RR, 0.14; 95%CI, 0.03 – 0.57; p = 0.006) and marginally significant, 72% lower than sporadic users (RR, 0.28; 95%CI, 0.07 – 1.18; p = 0.083), while sporadic users had a 51% reduction compared to non-users (RR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.32 – 0.76; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 10-times increase in mortality risk and 7-times increased risk of dying from COVID-19, compared to strictly regular use of ivermectin in a prospectively collected, strictly controlled population. A progressive dose-response pattern was observed between level of ivermectin use and level of protection from COVID-19 related outcomes and consistent across different levels of ivermectin use.

Study Authors:

Lucy Kerr, Instituto Kerr
Fernando Baldi, São Paulo State University
Raysildo Barbosa Lôbo, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Washington Luiz Olivato Assagra
Fernando Carlos Proença
Jennifer A Hibberd
Juan Chamie, Universidad EAFIT
Pierre Kory,   Front-Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
Cadegiani Flávio, Applied Biology

ivermectin box

Global Warming “Science” Is Not Science

0

Anyone who has listened to the overblown “Climate Science” with a critical viewpoint has realized that very little the warmists say makes sense.

The Warmists assume that the only thing that heats the atmosphere is greenhouse gases. They ignore the long-known fact that the atmosphere is heated by wind blowing over the surface, picking up heat through conduction and convection.

Missing this simple fact not only shows they are scientifically incompetent, it also shows willful negligence pushed on by a preset ideology that has been drummed into everyone around the world, creating generations of people tricked into believing the false global warming hype.

So-called greenhouse gases cannot absorb the sun’s radiation, which is too high frequency; they can only absorb the low frequency radiation emitted by cold substances such as the surface of the earth. Such radiation emitted by cold substances is almost nonexistent.

Real scientists determined more than a century ago that a small amount of carbon dioxide absorbs all radiation available to it. Once it is saturated, more carbon dioxide cannot absorb more radiation.

https://nov79.com/gbwm/gbwm.html

Listen to World Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts

0

On January 24, 2022 U.S. Senator Ron Johnson invited a group of world renowned doctors and medical experts to the U.S. Senate to provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.

This 38 minute video that highlights the 5-hour discussion.

Below here is the full 5-hour version.

medical experts
Medical Experts with Senator Ron Johnson

Doctor Refused to Harm Patients: Attacked By Government and Mainstream Media

0

This British doctor refused to go along with the government’s false narrative about COVID-19 and was ostracized and then prevented from practicing medicine. He is only one of thousands, who refused to harm patients, but many more doctors were blackmailed into going along with the narrative.

Listen to what he says happened to him, and how the mainstream media in Commonwealth countries, including Australia have destroyed doctors who stood up for truth.

You may never trust doctors so easily again once you hear this.

Governments around the world banned safe medications such as Ivermectin that worked against the SARS virus in 2003. Governments and useless “medical professionals” also promoted the use of masks, which are harmful to many people.

Masks Are Ineffective (47 Studies) and Masks Are Harmful (32 Studies)

0

The exaggerated fear in the first months of COVID, after WHO changed the pandemic definition to include less dangerous pathogens, has been manipulated to continue to scare people, using masks.

Masks Are Ineffective

Masks are ineffective, according to 47 different studies. But the people running the scare campaigns don’t care. Their aim is to scare those who are easily manipulated – into getting vaccines and boosters – ignoring the serious downsides of the untested new technology “vaccines.”

Masks are Harmful

Masks are harmful to the wearer and to children, according to 32 different studies. But again, the people running the scare campaigns don’t care. Their aim is to scare those who are easily manipulated – into getting vaccines and boosters – ignoring the serious downsides of the untested new technology “vaccines.”

Masks Are Ineffective (47 Studies) and Masks Are Harmful (32 Studies)
Masks Are Ineffective (47 Studies) and Masks Are Harmful (32 Studies). Image by rottonara from Pixabay

Neil Oliver Notices World Leaders Reading From The Same Script

Neil Oliver, the Scottish television documentary presenter, known for Coast, A History of Scotland, Vikings, is an investigator whose brain runs on ancient “hunter” software. This means Neil Oliver sees patterns in the world around him, patterns that indicate threats great and small ahead. This is good brain software to have.

Neil Oliver’s eloquent speech, delivered in just under nine minutes points out that a “choir” of world leaders, including Emanuel Macron, Boris Johnson, Justin Trudeau, Joe Biden, Jacinda Ardern, Tony Blair, talked about “build back better”  and “a window of opportunity.” Their waffle was parrotted by Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Gretta Timberg, Prince Charles, Sadiq Khan and others, including the media.

This is a warning for those who can see these patterns, delivered out in the open, but they are deadly for those who do not see them. The people who do not see these patterns are walking straight into a trap. They may not see the pattern or the trap even after it smacks them in the face.

Sadly, the people who do not see the patterns have been trained to do what the German public was trained to do in the 1930s – fight against the people who see the patterns and provide warnings. They have been trained to belittle and even hate the people who do not believe the false “leaders.”

Now it is time to listen to Neil Oliver’s words, and after that, read the final paragraphs of this note, because it is addressed to you if you still believe that world leaders have your best interests at heart.

WATCH The bumbling and mumbling world ‘leaders,’ skating on thin ice over very deep dark water, mumbo-jumbo on cue:

Our “leaders” have been corrupted. It could be they are being blackmailed, but they are willingly leading their people (you and I) into a trap that will be difficult, maybe impossible, to get out of.

I hope you can now stop attacking the people who seem to have strange ideas that are different to yours. Attacking them is what these corrupt “leaders” want you to do.

Instead, go to the other posts on this site, where you will learn that the “very rare” devastating side effects of the new mRNA vaccines are not rare at all. You will learn about real doctors, like Dr. Robert Malone, who are not frightened by the government, who tell you to beware and to protect your children. And you will learn that your country’s leaders are not acting in your best interests.

A big problem for you is that you will have to admit that you’ve been tricked into going along with their subterfuge, and admitting you’ve been tricked is hard to do. But don’t let that stop you, just switch sides and question everything, because your life and your way of life are both at stake.

Also, look for more words of truth from Neil Oliver.

COVID Vaccines Killed More People In 2021 Than All Other Vaccines Killed in 32 Years

0

Government data shows that COVID vaccines killed more people in the past year than all other vaccines killed over 32 years.

2021 will go down in history as the year that an unprecedented number of lives were destroyed by experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

And apparently, of the people who could stop this, none of them wanted to stop it. Instead, they willfully ignored the fact that it was happening, they denied that it was happening and they told the people that it was not happening.

COVID Vaccines Killed More People In One Year Than All Other Vaccines Killed in 32 Years
COVID Vaccines Killed More People In One Year Than All Other Vaccines Killed in 32 Years